eqj

HOME

 

Automatic Tuning of Operator-Supplied Dynamic Models in PSS®E Based on Real-Plant Measurements

M. Lozano Deiros, D. Marquina Cordero, D. M. Rivas Ascaso

CIRCE – Technology Center, Parque Empresarial Dinamiza, Zaragoza (Spain).

full-paper

2026-06-27

E&Q4-Cover

Abstract

Transmission system operators require dynamic models calibrated to match real plant behavior, yet tuning is often manual, slow, and difficult to reproduce. This paper presents a fully automated calibration framework for renewable generation models based on Differential Evolution algorithms (DE), particularly Differential Evolution [1], implemented through the PSS®E Python API [2]. The calibration is formulated as a bounded nonlinear time-domain optimization problem in which candidate parameter sets are iteratively evaluated via dynamic simulations and compared against field measurements. The methodology is demonstrated on REE’s PPMREE5 module by tuning a set of 15 parameters selected for their impact on the frequency-response behavior. Using active-power frequency response tests under over- and under-frequency events, the proposed approach improves the agreement between simulated and measured responses and accurately reproduces both transient and steady-state behavior. The results show that the framework provides a systematic, reproducible and scalable alternative to manual tuning for renewable plant model validation.

Key words: Dynamic Model Calibration, Power System Dynamics, PSSE, Genetic Algorithms, Grid Code Compliance

Published in: Energies & Quality Journal (E&QJ)
ISSUE: Vol. 4. No.2 Pages: 154-157
E-ISSN: 2659-8779 Date of Current Version: 2026-06-27
REF: 337-26 Issue Date: 2026-07-15
DOI:10.24084/eqj26-337 Publisher: AEDERMACP/ EA4EPQ

References

[1] R. Storn y K. Price, «Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for Global Optimization over Continuous Spaces,» Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 11, pp. 341-359, 1997.

[2] Siemens PTI, PSSE Program Application Guide, Siemens Industry Software Inc, 2023.

[3] Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica, «Procedimiento de Operación 9: Información intercambiada por el operador del sistema,» BOE, 2019.

[4] M. Asmine et al, «Model Validation for Wind Turbine Generator Models,» IEEE Transactions On Power Systems, vol. 26, nº 3, pp. 1769-1781, 2011.

[5] S. Rashid Khazeiynasab y J. Qi, «Generator Parameter Calibration by Adaptive Approximate Bayesian Computation with Sequential Monte Carlo Sampler,» IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 12, nº 5, pp. 4327-4338, 2021.

[6] S. Rashid Khazeiynasab y J. Qi, «PMU Measurement Based Generator Parameter Calibration by Black-Box Optimization with A Stochastic Radial Basis Function Surrogate Model,» de 52nd North American Power Symposium (NAPS), 2020.

[7] Scipy Developers, «scipy.optimize.differential_evolution,» 2024. [En línea]. Available: https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.optimize.differential_evolution.html.

[8] Red Eléctrica de España, «PPMREE5 Model User Guide Version 5,» 2024.

 
logos0
 
baner-renovables

E&Q Journal is edited by:

AEDERMACP/EA4EPQ
C/ Ramón Aller, 83
36500 Lalin
Pontevedra (Spain)

ICREPQ

Copyright © 2025 EA4EPQ All rights are reserved