|
|
||||||||||||
|
Abstract Hydroelectric reservoirs in Colombia are vast, underutilized surfaces with enormous potential in complementary renewable generation via floating photovoltaic (FPV) systems. The study assesses the technical potential and feasibility of FPV deployment in the country’s largest hydroelectric power plants, such as Guavio, San Carlos, Ituango, Chivor, Sogamoso, Porce III, Pagua, Guatapé, and Betania, each exceeding 500 megawatts (MW) of effective net capacity. In order to avail the available information from existing reservoir surface and solar irradiance maps and in terms of typical FPV performance variables, potential annual energy production is estimated over several (5%, 15%, and 30%) coverage scenarios. Our research demonstrates that even a conservative deployment (≤5% for instance) could generate several terawatt-hours (TWh) per year, providing considerable contributions to Colombia’s renewable energy mix with lower evaporation losses and better grid stability with hydro-solar hybridization. It also includes environmental, technical, and operational challenges such as aquatic ecosystem impacts, anchoring and maintenance, as well as the variability of water levels. Moreover, the paper reviews Colombia’s new regulatory regime, including the National Environmental Licensing Authority (ANLA) processes and the Energy and Gas Regulatory Commission (CREG) grid-connection regulations, to identify possible avenues for more efficient project authorization and integration. In general, the research presents floating solar technology as a practical and logical add-on to the hydroelectric infrastructure, in the context of Colombia’s energy transition and decarbonization ambitions. Key words: Floating photovoltaic systems, Hydroelectric reservoirs, Renewable energy integration, Colombia energy transition, Environmental and regulatory assessment.
References [1] A. Ranjbaran and M. Norozi, “Design and fabrication of a novel hybrid solar distillation system with the ability to brine recycling,” International Journal of Heat and Technology (2019), Vol. 37, pp. 751–760. [2] International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), “Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2023,” International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi (2024). [3] Koondhar, M. A., Albasha, L., Mahariq, I., Graba, B. B., & Touti, E. (2024). Reviewing floating photovoltaic (FPV) technology for solar energy generation. Energy Strategy Reviews, 54, 101449. [4] National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), “Utility-Scale PV | Electricity | 2024,” Annual Technology Baseline, 2024. Available: https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2024/utility-scale_pv. [5] Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales (IDEAM), Atlas de radiación solar de Colombia, Available: http://www.ideam.gov.co/web/tiempo-y-clima/radiacion. [6] L. Essak and A. Ghosh, “Floating photovoltaics: A review,” Clean Technologies (2022), Vol. 4, pp. 752–769. [7] P. Yang, L. H. Chua, K. N. Irvine, M. T. Nguyen and E. W. Low, “Impacts of a floating photovoltaic system on temperature and water quality in a shallow tropical reservoir,” Limnology (2022), Vol. 23, pp. 441–454. [8] E. Bellini, “Colombia tendrá su primera instalación fotovoltaica flotante,” pv magazine Latin America, Apr. 19, 2018. Available: https://www.pv-magazine-latam.com/2018/04/19/colombia-tendra-su-primera-instalacion-fotovoltaica-flotante/. [9] Comisión de Regulación de Energía y Gas (CREG), Nueva regulación para prestar el servicio de energía con paneles solares, CREG, 2023. Available: https://creg.gov.co/public_html/info/creg/media/tmp/pdf23674.pdf. [10] Gadzanku, S., Beshilas, L., & Grunwald, U. B. (2021). Enabling floating solar photovoltaic (FPV) deployment: review of barriers to FPV deployment in Southeast Asia. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/76867.pdf. [11] Micheli, L., & Talavera, D. L. (2023). Economic feasibility of floating photovoltaic power plants: Profitability and competitiveness. Renewable Energy, 211, 607-616. [12] Oliveira-Pinto, S., & Stokkermans, J. (2020). Assessment of the potential of different floating solar technologies–Overview and analysis of different case studies. Energy conversion and Management, 211, 112747. [13] Okoye, C. O., & Solyalı, O. (2017). Optimal sizing of stand-alone photovoltaic systems in residential buildings. Energy, 126, 573-584. [14] Oliveira-Pinto, S., & Stokkermans, J. (2020). Assessment of the potential of different floating solar technologies–Overview and analysis of different case studies. Energy conversion and Management, 211, 112747. [15] Farrar, L. W., Bahaj, A. S., James, P., Anwar, A., & Amdar, N. (2022). Floating solar PV to reduce water evaporation in water stressed regions and powering water pumping: Case study Jordan. Energy Conversion and Management, 260, 115598. [16] Lee, N., Grunwald, U., Rosenlieb, E., Mirletz, H., Aznar, A., Spencer, R., & Cox, S. (2020). Hybrid floating solar photovoltaics-hydropower systems: Benefits and global assessment of technical potential. Renewable Energy, 162, 1415-1427. [17] Lee, N., Grunwald, U., Rosenlieb, E., Mirletz, H., Aznar, A., Spencer, R., & Cox, S. (2020). Hybrid floating solar photovoltaics-hydropower systems: Benefits and global assessment of technical potential. Renewable Energy, 162, 1415-1427. [18] Liu, H., Krishna, V., Lun Leung, J., Reindl, T., & Zhao, L. (2018). Field experience and performance analysis of floating PV technologies in the tropics. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 26(12), 957-967. [19] Nguyen, N. H., Le, B. C., Nguyen, L. N., & Bui, T. T. (2023). Technical analysis of the large capacity grid-connected floating photovoltaic system on the hydropower reservoir. Energies, 16(9), 3780. [20] Attar, H., Alahmer, A., Borowski, G., & Alsaqoor, S. (2025). Comprehensive review of advancements, challenges, design, and environmental impact in floating photovoltaic systems. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology (EEET), 26(2). |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||